Divorce Attorneys
Maryland’s Highest Court Upholds State Law Favoring Traditional Marriage
|
|
Today, the Maryland Court of Appeals, in a 4-3 decision, upheld the state’s marriage law, which says “only a marriage between a man and a woman is valid in this state.” In January 2006 the circuit court for Baltimore City struck down the marriage law (Family Law Article 2-201) as discriminatory on the basis of sex, in violation of the Maryland Declaration of Rights, in the case of Conaway v. Deane. Maryland’s highest court reversed the circuit court, ruling today that the marriage law did not violate the state Equal Rights Amendment, did not discriminate on the basis of sex and that the state has an interest in fostering procreation and the traditional family. The court’s opinion stated: “In light of the fundamental nature of procreation, and the importance placed on it by the Supreme Court, safeguarding an environment most conducive to the stable propagation and continuance of the human race is a legitimate government interest.” When the case was appealed, Liberty Counsel filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Association of Maryland Families, urging the state’s highest court to uphold the marriage law. Liberty Counsel’s brief argued that the marriage law does not discriminate on the basis of sex. The Supreme Court established decades ago that marriage is a fundamental right, but it is not a standard-less right to marry whomsoever one chooses. It is only the right for one man and one woman to create a legal union without undue interference from the government. Preserving marriage as the union of one man and one woman furthers the state’s interest in maintaining an institution that forms the very foundation of society. Mathew D. Staver, Founder of Liberty Counsel and Dean of Liberty University School of Law, commented: “Marriage between one man and one woman is rooted in American history and forms the foundation for stable families and prosperous communities. The Maryland court has sided with common sense and objective reality.” |
Related Articles from Attorney for Divorce
Indiana Judge Upholds Marriage Law
Indiana state Superior Court Judge S.K. Reid has ruled that state law clearly defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman, dismissing a lawsuit attempting to win marital status for homosexuals. Reid said the existing law "promotes the state's interest in encouraging procreation to occur in a context where both biological parents are present to raise the child. ... No text of the [state] Constitution contains any provision specifically guaranteeing even traditional marriage, much less same-sex marriage," Reid said. Indiana Attorney General Steve Carter defended the decision. "Marriage is defined as a union between a man and a
Putting Maryland’s Marriage Law on Trial
On Jan. 20, a Baltimore circuit court judge, M. Brooke Murdock, thrust the state of Maryland into the middle of the national debate about same-sex marriage when she ruled that the state's 33-year-old definition of marriage -- "a union between a man and a woman" -- was unconstitutional. Her ruling immediately prompted Republican legislators to propose a constitutional amendment barring same-sex marriage, which could land the politically-sensitive issue in the lap of the Democratic-controlled legislature. Meanwhile, the Virginia legislature all but agreed last week to place a referendum on the November ballot that would ban same-sex marriage. News accounts about Murdock's
N.Y. State Supreme Justice Upholds Constitutionality of Marriage Law
The New York State Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that homosexual couples do not have a fundamental right to marry. State Supreme Court Justice Joseph Teresi dismissed challenges to New York’s marriage laws brought by thirteen same-sex couples, including State Representative Daniel J. O’Donnell – brother of Rosie O’Donnell, saying, the state’s definition of marriage as a union between one man and woman is not a constitutional violation of due process, equal protection and free speech rights. "[T]here is a legitimate state interest in granting marriage licenses only to opposite sex couples,” Teresi said. In October, Rockland County Supreme Court Justice Weiner had also
Maryland justices say no to marriage
Maryland's highest court, the Court of Appeals, ruled 4-3 on Tuesday to uphold the state's restriction of marriage to heterosexual couples. The court combined for four separate opinions, encompassing 244 pages. The bulk of the manuscript was the 111-page majority viewpoint, written by Judge Glenn T. Harrell Jr., and joined by three colleagues on the seven-member bench. Judge Irma Raker, concurring and dissenting in a lengthy opinion of her own, agreed with the New Jersey Supreme Court's determination in October that the "rights of marriage" are distinct from the institution itself -- paving the way for New Jersey's current civil-union law. While same-sex
NYC to Take Same-Sex Marriage Ruling Straight to State’s High Court
The New York City Law Department intends to take the Manhattan Supreme Court decision ordering the city to permit same-sex marriages straight to the Court of Appeals, the city's chief attorney announced Monday. "[W]e plan to seek permission to appeal directly to the Court of Appeals so that a decision on this important issue can be reached as quickly as possible," Corporation Counsel Michael A. Cardozo said in a written statement. "Since courts of this state disagree whether or not the state marriage law is unconstitutional, it is essential that this issue of statewide importance be decided definitively by the